This site is 100% ad supported. Please add an exception to adblock for this site.

Soc 245 Final Exam

Terms

undefined, object
copy deck
Companionate Love
affection we feel for those with whom our lives are deeply connected
Expert power
derived from knowledge of a particular area
Ways to gain power in an organization:
job-related activities: extraordinary, visible, relevant; Alliances: sponsors, peers, subordinates
subjugation of ingroup (exclusion of clique)
more powerful clique members are cruel to lower status members
group cohesion
the extent to which group members want to remain in the group
Passionate Love
a state of intense physiological arousal and intense longing for union with another- 3 components: cognitive, emotional, and behavioral; rapid onset, diminishes over time, increases substantially early in relationship
availability (proximity- nearness in space)
geographical or functional distance
Inclusion in cliques
realignment of friendships, ingratiation supplication, ingratiation manipulation, recruitment
organizational bases of power
nature of organization determines the power relations in it
Status
evaluation of a category or position in a group in terms of the position's prestige, importance, and value to the group
Equality
everyone pays same amount regardless of what they ate
Exclusion in cliques
expulsion, subjugation of outgroup, subjugation of ingroup, compliance, stigmatization
Impartiality (procedural justice)
bias suppression
representativeness (procedural justice)
voice
Power
ability of a person to achieve goals by influencing the behavior of another; depends on social norms, personal resources, dependency
recruitment (inclusion in cliques)
compliments, probationary period before full acceptance
Self-disclosure
revealing intimate aspects of yourself to others; increases over time, fosters closeness; varies by gender, nature of relationship; if you self-disclose, your partner is more likely to reciprocate
problems gaining power for minorities/women
less access to sponsors/informal networks; more difficulty building alliances; limited by glass ceilings and dead-end jobs; stereotypes to overcome
Reward power
potential to use reinforcement
characteristics aiding in resisting social influence:
strong initial opinion, high self-esteem, oriented toward accuracy and explanation for non-conformity, secure attachment to group
Interactional justice
application of normative rules to treatment of individuals- demonstrating respect, showing trustworthiness, acting neutrally
Cognitive balance
consistency between partners on attitudes (3 parts- you like friend, friend likes major, you like major)
collective responses -characteristics
shared perceptions and goals, resource mobilization, coordination
competence
increases ability to be right; but don't like people who are too competent/confident
Structural/situational approach- talking behavior
power produces differences in talking- not gender
positions
educational, vocational
Legitimation
process in which patterns of interaction acquire a normative character
Ethically (procedural justice)
coincides with moral values
social influence
the effect that people have on the beliefs or behaviors of others
Gain-loss theory
you will like someone more who used to dislike you and then began to like you; you will dislike someone more who used to like you and began to dislike you
Role of similarity in attraction
attitudes (tend to attribute your attitudes to people you like); and homogeneity (you like people you are similar to)
trust
belief that a person is honest and has positive intentions toward us
anticipatory liking
if you hear or know someone likes you, you are more likely to like them
attraction
positive attitude held by one person toward another- involved in friendships, romances, and mentoring
propinquity
nearness in time
Communality
provide for another- not interested in equal inputs/outputs
Power balancing strategies
withdrawal by power disadvantaged; give status to power-disadvantaged's actor's resources; develop alternative relations; develop coalitions
Distributive Justice
How to allocate resources- deals with OUTCOME (could use Equality, Equity, needs-based)
Types of Comparisons
Referential, Local, Internal
Communication
Effective when: immediate and without judgment (internal attributions); gender differences: women and men with egalitarian gender views are more likely to express emotion/communicate
Examples of Costs
time, compromises, beliefs and values, pain associated with break-up
Collective reactions to injustice
coalitions, collective actions (social movements and riots)
Likeness-leads-to-liking effect
if you are racist and someone of a different race has the same views as you, you will bypass your racism and become attracted to them
validity
Norms that require an individual's compliance
friendship
trust, understanding, mutual assistance
contrast effect
compare boyfriend to male model, boyfriend then looks less attractive to you
types of power
coercive, reward, legitimate, expert, referent
Internal comparisons
compare with oneself over time
Romantic Love Ideal
Love at first sight; only one person will inspire true love; true love can overcome any obstacle; our beloved is nearly perfect; we should base our choice of partners on love
consistency (procedural justice)
apply same procedures over time
what makes men and women physically attractive?
men with prominent features are more attractive--> dominance and maturity; women with soft features are more attractive-- nondominance, warm
Social networks
series of relationships between people and groups
Power
capacity to influence others despite their resistance and ability to resist being influenced by others- power is relational, structural, and tactical action
Constraints on power use
want to be liked; morals, norms, values; trust (of subordinates); fear of being removed from position; if power is characteristics of position, not person- person less likely to abuse power; constraints affect use, not structure
Power as Dependence- Exchange approach
P(ab) = D (ba) <-- dependence varies directly with value of resources desired and indirectly with resource availability
conformity
internal change in behavior due to real or imagined influence of others
Socialization/subculture approach -talking behavior
gender produces differences in talking- men give more orders, tell more jokes; women more polite, more emotion-laden talk
Burden-of-proof process
although race/other diffuse status characteristics are not relevant to task, will play a role in solving task- must tell people that race, etc. is not relevant
Pratt-fall effect
we like competent people who make mistakes
Procedural Justice
procedures used to allocate resources- deals with PROCESS/PROCEDURE (impartiality, representativeness, consistency, accuracy, ethically just)
Formal legitimate authority
more important than gender for determining various aspects of conversation
social categories
class, age, appearance, gender, race
informational influence
accept info from others as valid
physical attractiveness
socialized about what defines physical attractiveness from an early age- media
Liking
admiration and strong friendly attraction
Expectation States Theory
explains how differences in cognitions and evaluations of individuals become the basis for a stable social hierarchy- applies to equal status groups- explains why the leader has that position- because of his or her diffuse or specific characteristics
endorsement (gives validity)
support from below
Reciprocation of liking
when you find out someone likes you, you are more likely to like them
examples of rewards
good conversations, more attention from others if partner is attractice
ingratiation supplication (inclusion in cliques)
lower status clique members are complimentary of higher status clique members
Justice
evaluations of situations in terms of fairness (Evan and Nancy holt ex)
Balanced and imbalanced power structures
balanced power structures are equally dependent and imbalanced structures are unequally dependent; affects rates of exchange, development of commitment and trust
How justice rules are developed
they are socially constructed (depends on socio-historical/cultural context); refer to the interplay between society and the individual (socialization); refer to social exchange, beliefs about status, and means to achieve goals)
construction of status belief based on:
initially unequal resource levels and nominal characteristics; population sorted by nominal characteristics; correlation between resources levels and nominal characteristics
Status Construction Theory
status is socially constructed within cultures, and status signifies a trait as more worthy than another
Realignment of friendships (inclusion in cliques)
clique members abandon old friendships/destroy existing ones
to overcome problems gaining power, minorities and women must:
increase numbers, balance groups, demonstrate performance
Loving
attachment to and caring about another person; more intense than liking; involves characteristics of friendship + caring and passion
compliance
outward change in behavior due to real or imagined influence of other people, often due to hope for reward or fear of punishment
ingratiation manipulation (inclusion of cliques)
leader manipulates others in clique in order to hold their loyalty and attention
compliance (exclusion of clique)
following negative behavior of clique leader
Referent power
derived from admiration
subjugation of outgroup (exclusion of clique)
turning against outsiders solidifies group
types of justice
distributive, procedural, interactional
Asch's (1951) study
person disagreed with group when group not unanimous, and when person had privacy to make own decision
mere exposure effect
the more you are exposed to something, the more you like it
Characteristics of Justice
impartial, consensus, foster social cooperation to promote individual well-being, meets some expectation regarding an existing rule
Conformity highest when:
task is difficult or ambiguous; size of majority increases (more people agree); majority unanimous; group members exerting influence are seen as experts or have higher power or status, or are similar or important to target
factors affecting relationship dissolution:
inequality, differential level of commitment, dissatisfaction with rewards and/or communication
normative influence
act in accordance to norms
Diffuse status characteristics
social categories (gender, age, race, education, physical attractiveness); roles defining/describing person
homogeneity
you like people you are similar to
Specific status characteristics
special abilities (great chef)- must be salient
Local comparisons
compare with a single other individual
Status Characteristics Theory
performance expectations (evaluation of individual's level of task competence) dependent upon types of status characteristics
Reasons for different evaluations of justice
situational goals (social harmony, social welfare, productivity); position in relationship; comparisons; belief system/orientations; perceptions of what is relevant or causes responsibility
Coercive power
potential to deliver threats and punishments
a few cognitive responses to injustice
feel distressed, so motivated to relieve distress- if disadvantaged- feel anger, frustration; if advantaged- feel guilt or happiness
authorization (gives validity)
support from above
Status level and influence/competence- relation
high status=more competent (take more/given more action opportunities; make more performance outputs; outputs positively evaluated) low status=less competent (take fewer/given fewer action opps; make less performance outputs; outputs less positively evaluated)
Reward Theory of Attraction
You want to maximize rewards and minimize costs in relationships
group
a social unit that consists of 2 or more people characterized by membership, interaction, shared goals, and shared expectations and norms
Obedience
compliance to a direct order from a person of higher status or authority
Dyadic withdrawal
increasing reliance on one person for gratification and decreasing reliance on others
proximity
nearness in space
a few behavioral responses to injustice
try to restore actual justice- change outcomes or inputs, change comparison other, leave situation, complain
stigmatization (exclusion of clique)
clique members make fun of each other
Self-fulfilling prophecy
treat beautiful people as if they are nice, so they act nice to you because of the nice way you treat them; also beautiful people perceived as more intelligent
physical attractiveness stereotype
what is beautiful is good (snow white)
Power in organizations
ability to get things done in an organization by mobilizing resources
interdependence
mutual dependence on one another in relationship
Strategies to reduce effects of status:
present add'l info on status characteristics, relevance of characteristics; create inconsistency in status info; demonstrate equal or superior competence; have legitimacy
accuracy (procedural justice)
base decisions on accurate info
Equity
everyone pays for what they ate
Legitimate power
derived from authority role
Expulsion (exclusion in cliques)
permanent excommunication from clique
Referential comparisons
compare with people like oneself

Deck Info

117

permalink