Finals - Art History - Connections
Terms
undefined, object
copy deck
- commercial; what america wants at the time (yuppies); imitation art in a way
- photorealism vs. mike bidlo
- personal vs. completely distancing; non-materialistic vs. all about the money
- performance art vs. photorealism
- anyone can be an artist regardless of experience, vs. anyone can be an artist with the right training
- the aids quilt vs. the academy
- neither about making money; but one was very much a part of the work and the other was very much anonymous and removed
- abstract expressionism (pollock) vs. jenny holzer
- totally original and personal vs. just a way to make money, to copy
- abstract expressionism (pollock) vs. mike bidlo
- earthly & natural (mendieta); not meant to be bought or sold; temporary
- earth art vs. performance art
- taking a typically beautiful human entity and marring it; they look like monsters, out of place (woman one vs. composition 250)
- abstract expressionism (kooning) vs. cindy sherman
- warhol was very distancing and desensitized; his work meant nothing to him; whereas performance art was highly personal (ana mendiete, hannah wilke, etc.)
- pop art (warhol) vs. performance art
- both were highly personal; their art spoke for itself; non-traditional mediums (mendieta, wilke)
- abstract expressionism (pollock) vs. performance art
- both were highly removed from their work
- pop art (warhol) vs. 1980s feminist art
- personal (experiences) vs. impersonal (critique of society)
- 1970s feminist art vs. 1980s feminist art
- completely original vs. copies ; non-commercial vs. completely commercial
- performance art vs. mike bidlo
- innovation, redefining beauty; no subject vs. subject; in some cases very personal (wilke) and in some cases not really at all (kiki smith)
- abstract expressionism (pollock) vs. abject body art
- both celebrate traditional, accessible craft materials
- the aids quilt vs. the dinner party
- highly personal (mendieta, ****-shaped); meant to make a statement; not concerned with being bought or sold
- performance art vs. 1970s feminist art
- warhol was highly removed while you don't get much more personal than the aids quilt; one desensitizes, one is overwhelmingly emotional
- pop art (warhol) vs. the aids quilt
- link to daily life; bringing art to the community in some way
- the aids quilt vs. post-modernism
- warhol just wanted to make money; holzer wanted to make people think; but both were removed from their work
- pop art (warhol) vs. jenny holzer
- trying to make a change; trying to get people to stand up to the way things worked; no buying or selling really
- the aids quilt vs. jenny holzer
- making a statement; personal vs. anonymous
- performance art vs. jenny holzer
- both touched on familiarity, this is something we've seen before type feeling, both used photography (warhol sometimes); but warhol would alter his work a little and photorealism wouldn't; audrey flack and warhol were both in it for the money
- pop art (warhol) vs. photorealism
- both were capitalizing on their work; they found a niche in the market and went for it (with warhol, people were hungry for familiarity and comfort in art; with bidlo, people were hungry for pseudo-elitism and feeling rich and important)
- pop art (warhol) vs. mike bidlo
- reveals the humanity and realism behind things that weren't often talked about; didn't necessarily made them beautiful, but made them art; gave them attention
- the aids quilt vs. abject body art
- warhol took the horrific and made it desensitized; abject body art took the ideal and made it horrific (so help me hannah, intra-venus, kiki smith's pee body)
- pop art (warhol) vs. abject body art
- non-traditional art forms; one person vs. often including the community
- performance art vs. post-modernism
- every time they're viewed, the experience changes
- the aids quilt vs. the running fence
- use of human bodies for art; twist on common ideals of beauty
- 1970s feminist art vs. abject body art
- warhol was very distancing and desensitized; his work meant nothing to him; whereas 1970s feminist art was highly personal (the kitchen in womanhouse, hannah wilke)
- pop art (warhol) vs. 1970s feminist art
- personal (mendieta) vs. impersonal (sherman); non-commercial vs. commercial (sherman)
- performance art vs. 1980s feminist art
- reliant on volunteers; enormous scale; not focused on materialism or commercialism; not meant to be bought or sold
- earth art vs. the aids quilt
- they both thought anyone could be an artist, but the academy required training and earth artists didn't
- the academy vs. earth art
- both involved in the natural world, abolishing ideas of ideal beauty
- earth art vs. abject body art
- not meant to be bought or owned, on materialism, and brings art to the people
- the aids quilt vs. typically 70s art in general
- highly emotional (mendieta); not meant to be bought or sold; anti-commercialism
- performance art vs. the aids quilt
- anyone can be an artist regardless of talent vs. only people born with the gift can be an artist
- the aids quilt vs. modernism
- not meant to be bought or sold; stretching the definition of art (innovation)
- earth art vs. jenny holzer
- using the body to create art; natural
- performance art vs. abject body art
- non-representational vs. completely realistic; personal vs. totally removed; painterly vs. unpainterly; not in it for the money vs. in it for the money
- abstract expressionism (pollock) vs. photorealism
- abstract expressionism was extremely personal and elitist, whereas pop art brought commercialism to art and remained very distanced
- abstract expressionism (pollock) vs. pop art (warhol)
- not meant to be bought or sold (dinner party, project womanhouse); temporary (project womanhouse, ****-shaped)
- earth art vs. 1970s feminist art
- pop art was immersed in commercialism while earth artists thought commercialism tainted art; however they both brought art to the people; one was distancing though and one was inviting
- pop art (warhol) vs. earth art
- both were highly personal; but one was elitist and one was for anyone who wanted to
- abstract expressionism (pollock) vs. the aids quilt
- materialism vs. no intention of being bought or sold; unconventionality vs. return to more classic forms
- earth art vs. photorealism
- earth art is all about making temporary, non-material works; mike bidlo is all about making money
- earth art vs. mike bidlo
- both very involved in familiarity; not so much interested in elitism; taking the capital A out of art
- earth art vs. post-modernism
- impersonal; link to daily life; more accessible; non-elitist subject matter (except maybe Jolie Madame)
- photorealism vs. post-modernism
- personal vs. impersonal
- abstract expressionism (pollock) vs. 1980s feminism
- both were highly personal; their art spoke for itself; non-traditional mediums (project womanhouse, wilke)
- abstract expressionism (pollock) vs. 1970s feminist art
- both pollock and earth art used nontraditional materials to create their art; both interested in art for art's sake
- abstract expressionism (pollock) vs. earth art
- neither is created to last a long time; neither is meant to be bought or sold
- performance art vs. earth art
- removed; text used a lot (kruger); trying to get people to question the way things are (sherman)
- 1980s feminist art vs. jenny holzer
- art vs. Art; daily life vs. you need to have a certain eye to understand
- abstract expressionism (pollock) vs. post-modernism
- emotional, highly personal, not so much meant to be bought or sold
- 1970s feminist art vs. the aids quilt