This site is 100% ad supported. Please add an exception to adblock for this site.

ADHD 2

Terms

undefined, object
copy deck
Kendel 2000
Maladaptive across situations
Achenback
probs externalizing and internalizing
DSMIV
1 Inattention
2Hyperactivity
3 Impulsivity
Criteria (4)
less 7 yrs
impared w less 2 setting
social, academic, occupational & social imparement
Subcategories 2
Attention only
hyper-impulsive
scholte 2001
factor analysis
pearson's r
412 kids
18 symptoms by carers
Kerns 2001 4
ADHD matched sample
Inhib
Attention
time
Gershon 2
Girls
key symptoms
Rucklidge & Tannock
Girls more intellect probs & lang probs
Rucklidge & Tannock 2
Boys less speech probs
Girls impared attributions
Gender paradox
More boys
Greene
Girls more interpersonal probs & social
Gershon, Rucklidge & Tannock
Internalizing probs ADHD
Evolution 2
natural altruism
natural selection
Gilger 2
80% concord MZ
30% DZ
Deutsch 87 4
Retrospective adopt
adoptee= adhd
bio high adhd
bio high mood dis
Castellanos 2002
7
10yr
medicated vs non
mri
grey & white matter
decrease volume
no ^ w age
early genetic
Thapar
Cf twins register
MZ 100% concord
dop recept DRD4
Corroborated
Antenatal to nicotine
4
animal study
nicotine = dop increase
Increase nicot = increase hyper
nicotine predictor
Millberger 97
2
20-25% kids ADHD smoked
10% didnt
Thapar 2003
10
1452 Great match twin reg
mothers smoke in preg
american journal psych
0-20 cigs
Teacher report
3/4 variance to smoking
common environment
10% variance to smoking
if remove smoking ^ outcome of risk factors
Barkley 98
•Exec function
•self reg
•hyper and impulse
•frontal brain damage
Leung & conolly 96
Distraction doesnt fx adhd
Lorch 2000
Tv and toys distract
Douglas 83
Novel or salient
Taylor 95
Not sustained worse over time
Van de Meer & Seargent
Irrelevant stim increases performance
Taylor 95
3
Sustained attention
ADHD more errors
slower than TD
Swaab- Barneveld 2000
attention deficit in other dis
Slusarek 2001
•Motivation deficit
•poor underrewards
Dane, Schachari & Tannock 2001
ADHD more acive in afternoon than TD
Porrino 83
4
ADHD boys more active in maths and reading
than recess or PE
More structured = worse
Schater & logan 90
4
Stop signal task
press to stimulate than to inhibit
(WCST)
ADHD bad
Whalen 89
Matching famil figures test
ADHD not always match
Sonuga Barke 94
Impared IQ 3 yrs
Schacter 1991
• many normal IQ
Faraone 96
• Lots of learning dis kids
Willcut 2001
•Non-ADHD vs Reading dis
•worst in retrieve and memorising wrds
Willcut 2001
2
•Non-ADHD vs Reading dis
•worst in retrieve and memorising wrds
Tannock 2000 (repeated Willcutt 2001)
• 7-11yrs
• Inattention predicts later reading probs
Barkley 92,98
• special classes
•bad grades
•50% need tutoring
Pennington & Ozonoff 96
EF
Whalen & Henker 98
High social impact
Cadesky, Mota & schachter 2000
• Independently process social cues
Menlick & Henshaw 96
• Goals at expense of social rules
Flicek 92
Other kids view ADHD kids as neg
Lahey 98
Teachers assoc ADHD as low co-op and disruptive
Barkley 98
4
• parents directive & intrusive
• Parenting stress
•Alchol use
•High marital conflict and divorce
Szatmari 89
3
7% poison, 23% bone AD
3% poison, 15% TD
• older= driving offenses & accidents
Hinshaw 98
•Deficient in self care
•Must be watched
Barkley 90
more salient rewards
Tripp & alsop 2001
immediate reward better than delayed
Songua & Berke
due to avoid delay not move towards immediate
Barkley 5
Working mem
Time
Aman, Roberts & Pennington
Boys felt bad when did badly; not a general motivation prob
Denney & Rapport 2001
•Impared working mem
•representations disorganised
•redirected into less slowly processed tasks
Douglas 88
•high order processing
•deficit w inhib
•deficit w arrousal
•deficit w understand beh cons
Quay 97
Is underactive adhd
Geller 2002
externalizing
OCD 30% comorb
Costin 2002
rates higher in clinic than community
Whalen & Hecker 98
Oppositional defiant disorder
35-70% ADHD=develops ODD
30-50% ADHD=CD
Nader 2001
ODD/ADHD one disorder?
NO!
•Different symptom clusters
• Waschbusch 2002
Distinct other features
Combination of three distinct features;
High range conduct dis, worse ADHD
Gadow & Nolan 2002
Holds for pre-schoolers
Strong fx on peer relations
and social functioning
Wasbuch 2002
but they are morelikely a combination of fx not a more complex fx.
Jensen 1997
Should adhd and 3 subcategories be together?
Barkley 2002
101 teenagers
39 community controls
ADHD< attention
time
diff work mem
Behavioral inhib
CNS
Social learning
Tantam 91
Anxiety Depression Schizo
Kiln 94
Continuum?
Wing
Au spectrum
Schopler 88
Variant
Szatsmari 89
HFA
Tantam
AS/HFA = continum
Burgoine & wing
Triplets No speech delay
Szatsmari
IQ controlled AS best apple, banana, truck , grouping AS WCST HFA- motor coordiation
Ozonoff 91
ICD-10 Diff VIQ Emotion perception Central exec Verbal mem TOM AS increased
Kiln 95
ICD 10 Age and IQ matched AS VIQ>PIQ HFA-VIQ=PIQ Motorskills Visual-motor Non-verbal Vis-memory
Method probs Criteria IQ and MA Methodology
Prior 98
HFA/AS/PDD WISC, TOM, ADS checklist Verbal task OOO No language TOM BC Evidence for continuum
B+C close to norm, group overlap AS & HF similarities Few friendships Low speech Dinosaur
Satmari 92
Diagnoses shouldnÂ’t be everything
As
Good TOM Socially abnormal Scripts Timing
Gilchrist 2001
AS/HFA/CD WISC/ADI/ADOS – good validity Retrospecive report No difficulties Speech Imitative play Motor control Verbal language
Mayes & Calhoun 2002
HFA same development of asp later
Prior 98
No differences between A and AS
Mayes 2001
Use same AS no language probs Speech later develops
Baron Cohen
Less impared AS/A
Gilberg Coleman 93
25% A=HFA
Kugler 98
Aeitiogenesis and pathogenesis Understand wait longer
Rapin 99
Rubella Thalidomide Herpes Tuberous sclerosis Fragile x Angleman Cornelia de ange syndrome Delong Brian damage Neurotransm
Wing 83
MZ% concord
Bailey, Le couter and Gottesman 95
Multiple genes
Gilberg 98
A= 44 chromo linked
Rutter 98
Partial tetrasomy chromo 15
Gilberg and coleman 92
Male personality
Szatmari 98
X linked seratonin tranporter Env and brain inj
Smalley
Sib 3-8% diagnosed autism
Hallmayer 96
X chromo ¾ genes for autism
Rodier 2000
Relatives – “50-50 phenotype”
Folstein 99
DS vs Au – Au relative problem
Fombonne 97
low verbal IQ
Delong 99
High no of BGTC circuitry disorders
Cohen and hammer 97
Parents of asp have high visual perception
Volmar kin & pauls 2000
Genetic high aspergers

Deck Info

103

permalink