This site is 100% ad supported. Please add an exception to adblock for this site.

Psychology Exam 3 Tilley

Terms

undefined, object
copy deck
social psychology
psychology in application to social situtations (how thoughts and behaviors are influenced by others)
primacy effect
\"first impression\" tendency to attend to information that \"fits\" with our initial impression of a person
self-fulfilling prophecy
our own first impression can lead us to misinterpret others behaviors
Rosenthal Late Bloomers
-study to illustrate power of self fulfilling prophecy -drew names out of a hat and told teachers which would excel academically -teachers subconciously inflated those childrens\' grades
self fulfilling prophency also known as
rosenthal effect or pygmalion effect
attribution
study of how we make judgments about the cause of a behavior
external attribution
we determine the cause of the behavior is something \"external\" or \"outside\" of the person..not the person\'s fault
internal attribution
the cause of a behavior is something \"internal\" or \"inside\" the person...it is the person\'s fault
Fundemental Attribution Error
tendency to over emphasize internal causes or personal causes of others negative behaviors..under emphasize internal causes of our own negative behaviors
self serving bias
tendency to over emphasize internal factor when we are succesful and under emphasize internal factors when others are successful
Just World Hypothesis
people get what they deserve
proximity
most important factor with respect to interpersonal attraction..the closer you are with someone the more likely you are to find them attractive
physical attractiveness
we tend to like more physically attrative people than less physically attractive people -we assume more physically attractive people are intelligent, happy, kind, sensitive
similarity
we tend to be attracted to people who are similar to us-share similar background, beliefs, value systems
complimentary traits
seemingly opposite trait that compliments each other
exchange
gain-loss theory of attraction...we like people who show gradual increase in interest over time as opposed to the person who shows a bunch of interest right off the start
intimacy
quality of genuine closeness and trust achieved in communication with another person
Festinger cognitive dissonance
1967 2 groups of people Both completed same task but one got paid $20 the other $1
Who enjoyed experiment?
$1 group enjoyed it..relaxing to them
Explanation to Festinger
cognitive dissonance
Cognitive dissonance
psychiological discomfortthat occurs when there are incongruence between our beliefs and our actions
cognitive dissounce is so powerful we will either..
change actions or change beliefs
$20 group
no incongruence, so no cognitive dissonance
$1 group
much incongruence, so much cognitive dissonance..must either change action or belief
conformity
yieling to social pressures
Asch experiment
1950s group shown set of lines and told to match one with a traget line CATCH all were actors except one person...so actors picked one obvisously wrong 1/3 people ended up comforming
factors affecting conformity
group size, group unanimity, the more attached one is to the group, the more one expects to interact with group, the lower the status of a person, the less accepted the person is
compliance
getting someone to do something subsequent to a request
foot in the door technique
saying \"yes\" to something increases the chances of saying \"yes\" to something else
door in the face technique
asking for something ridiculous follwed by a much more reasonable request
socail action
how we act in groups of people
deindividuation
loss of sense of personal responsibility in a group of people (you gain a sense of anonymity)
by stander effect
tendency of a person\'s helpfulness in emergency decreases as the number of bystanders increases
diffusion of responsibility
more people that are present, the more likely the person will perceive his/her personal sense of responsibility to be diffused throughtout those people

Deck Info

34

cgoers

permalink