This site is 100% ad supported. Please add an exception to adblock for this site.

Sherwood Soc Exam 2

Terms

undefined, object
copy deck
a collection of people who interact with one another and have a feeling of unity
social group
just a number of people who happen to be in one place but don\'t interact. ex. street or audience
social aggregate
a number of people who have something in common but who neither interact with one another nor gather in one place
social category
who experimented with boys in cabins becoming parts of groups?
Muzafer Sherif
group to which an individual is a strongly tied member
in-group
group of which an individual is not a strongly tied member
out-group
what are some cohesive in-group characteristics?
1. members use symbols like names, slogans or badges to identify themselves
2. view themselves with positive stereotypes and other groups with negative stereotypes
3. inclined to compete or clash with the out-group

a group that is used as the frame of reference for evaluating one\'s behavior
reference group
imitation of the reference group as in your parents having high self esteem, therefore you would have self esteem
normative effect
those who achieve their groups goal by getting others to focus on task performance.
instrumental leaders aka autocratic leaders
achieve group harmony by making others feel good
expressive leaders aka democratic leaders
lets others work more or less on their own
laissez-faire (French meaning \'let do\')
What is George Simmel\'s term for two in a group and it being a very personal group
diatic
what is George Simmel\'s term for a group of three, being less personal than a group of two
a triad
the privilege that allows leaders to deviate from their groups\' norms or their society\'s norms
idiosyncrasy credit
Who experimented with one test subject and multiple actors who guess obviously wrong at the longest line to see if the subject conforms
Solomn Asch
the tendency for members of a cohesive group to maintain a consencus to the extent of ignoring the truth
groupthink
webs of social relationships that link individuals or groups to one another. (college, workplace, peers, religions)
social networks
money and service given by family or friends to help us cope with problems
instrumental support
groups whose activities are rationally designed to achieve specific goals
formal organizations
who came up with the idea of higher participants (administrators) and lower participants (the rank and file)
Amitai Etzioni
what are Amitai Etzioni\'s three kinds of power available to higher partipants
1. coercive power
2. remunerative power
3. normative power

what is the use of physical force from higher participants to lower participants
coercive power
what is the use of material rewards/incentives to ensure cooperation bet. higher and lower participants
remunerative power
what is the use of moral persuasion from high participants to lower participants
normative power
what are three kinds of involvement by lower participants
1. alienative
2. calculative
3. moral

what is the type of lower participant involvement in which they don\'t support the organization\'s rules
alienative
what is the kind of lower partipant involvement in which they are moderately supportive
calculative
what is the kind of lower partipant involvement in which they strongly support the organization
moral

Deck Info

29

Fivefeetlow

permalink